the semantics of ignorance

well, after posting the nonist faq last month, dealing with the idea of “embodying an objective world view” we sat, and stewed, and thought. we suspected the use of the word ignorance might be problematic, that is, might not convey the meaning intended because of the semantic weight of the word. to test the idea further we sent out a question to as many interesting folks as we could find. though we were often ignored, we did received quite a few replies, some more thoughtful than others. the question was this, “what is the value of ignorance, or if you prefer, does ignorance have any value?” some of the answers are as follows in no particular order

posted by jmorrison on 12/26 | announcements | permalink | send entry
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.