the paper architecture of brodsky & utkin
picked up a book yesterday from the princeton architectural press collecting some of the works by the russian architectural duo of alexander brodsky and ilya utkin and i’m very happy i did. got it for a song and it’s a really gorgeous book. or rather the 28 plates are. they’re an interesting duo, a bit like a visual rosencrantz and guildernstern in that they create etchings together and their styles are indistinguishable within the whole. the buildings and spaces they create are wildly poetic in no small part because they are by and large unbuildable. these are paper architects you see.
some snippets from the books into:
in 1957 kruschev declared socialist realist architecture the “over-decorated” style and abolished the academy of architecture. the notion of a critically assimilated cultural heritage (i.e. the reuse of classical forms to serve modern ideological ends) was replaced by a doctrine of unadorned utilitarianism. modern technology, especially prefabrication, was exploited to produce the urgently needed mass housing and aesthetic discourse of any kind was considered unnecessary and immoral. faceless functionalism continued to dominate throughout the brezhnev years as economic constraints, a hopelessly tangled bureaucratic procedure, a dearth of building materials, and a shrinking body of skilled laborers exacerbated unimaginative planning. this scenario confronted brodsky and utkin and their classmates at the moscow institute of architecture in the mid-seventies.
many of the more creative young soviet designers abandoned the exasperating professional situation they found themselves in while others like brodsky and utkin began using international competitions as a creative outlet.
as brodsky and utkin and a dozen or so other friends began to produce such projects in evenings and weekends over the next few years, the group assumed the title of “paper architects” - a derogatory epithet applied to avant-garde architects still producing radical work after the socialist realist clampdown of the thirties.
brodsky, utkin, and the others began producing visionary schemes in response to a bleak professional scene in which only artless and ill-conceived buildings, diluted through numerous bureaucratic strata and constructed out of poor materials by unskilled laborers, were being erected - if anything. as such their work constitutes a graphic form of architectural criticism, an escape into the realm of imagination that ended as a visual commentary on what was wrong with social and physical reality and how its ills might be remedied.
now that you’re prepped here are 10 of brodsky and utkin’s etchings (click all for large version)-
for a little more on the subject of “the paper architects” you might try here and here. for a bit on earlier “paper architects” see here.
if your interested in the book try the newer updated edition.
Read Less...
crystal palace puts me in mind of freedowm tower plans.
bulwark of resistance: interesting notion until a garbage truck wipes the patio out (note that the patio is a duplicate of the lower-level bedroom).
the columbarium mobile does not feel vast, as it is, but rather makes one feel small, like an ant in a closet where model houses line the shelves.
on the whole, this is like edward gorey’s metropolis of the future. there are still tragedies, but now they involve children riding their tricycles in the yard, falling to their deaths in the columbarium because there were no guard rails.
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 10/03 at 12:07 AM
columbarium habitabile, rather. why did i write ‘mobile’?
these pics would make good wallpaper, no?
posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 10/03 at 12:09 AM
These are fascinating—thank you.
posted by
misteraitch on 10/03 at 08:33 AM
I like so much the time here, it is mostly an enchanted moments, moments of discoveries, for a second you make me feel like a real Voyager in imaginative time and lands!
thank you
posted by
Moon on 10/05 at 07:56 PM
Why are all the posts and also comments all in lwer case, as though by so doing a whole new approach to something has been gained? ee cummings did this sort of thing and it was ok because he was trying graphaically to say things.Here though it is sijmply Fuck conventions…we reduce all things to one way. advise (or: Advise)
posted by
fred lapides on 10/06 at 09:03 PM
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.